🔗 Share this article

Well. From one perspective, the nation's protracted bid to host the Cop31 next year has ended in clear failure.

The effort ran for over 36 months for the privilege to put on the largest global environmental conference and green trade fair, which would have brought tens of thousands of delegates to the South Australian capital next fall.

That's not happening. Instead, the summit known as Cop31 is headed to the tourist destination of the Turkish coastal city, on the Mediterranean coast of Turkey.

Disappointment and Mixed Messages

The result will be a significant disappointment to numerous individuals who had believed hosting the environmental gathering could help accelerate the country's shift from being a fossil fuel economy to a renewable energy superpower, and bring global attention to the existential plight facing Pacific island nations, who would have been joint hosts.

The procedure that resulted in defeat has been an opaque mess. In recent days, there have been questions that Anthony Albanese and other high-ranking officials truly desired the bid to be approved. The prime minister's language were ambiguous at best. It translated to reports in the local and global press saying the administration was walking away.

This contrasted with the message being conveyed at the Cop30 talks in the city of Belem, where the Australian climate change minister, Chris Bowen, had just stated the country was "fully committed to success".

Ambiguous backing is not a new issue for the hosting proposal. While Bowen championed it, other high-level figures of the administration have only occasionally appeared to care.

The Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade, usually in charge for international climate negotiations, has been uninvolved and sometimes completely against.

There is little sign Albanese has considered UN climate conferences a important focus. He hasn't attended one since taking office in 2022. We'll never know, but some will wonder if additional efforts were possible to secure the hosting rights.

An Alternative View

That's one interpretation. But there is another way to consider it.

Considering the Cop30 talks this week in South America – and from an international perspective – the decision on Wednesday night may, ironically, have been the best result possible.

Bowen set out on Wednesday an unprecedented deal that he was developing with his Turkish counterpart, Murat Kurum. Turkey would be the conference leader, organizer and primary coordinator, and the Australian delegation – the climate minister – would take on the position as "chief negotiator", wrangling nearly 200 countries on the stuff that the countries actually attend for – the discussions on how to together address the environmental emergency.

Additionally, there would be a increased emphasis on the Pacific region, including a lead-up event on an island nation.

Reasons for Doubt

There are plenty of grounds for scepticism. The two nations do not have a strong partnership. Specific aspects of the deal had not been completed at the time of writing. The entire arrangement could fall over before it begins.

However, it might represent a way to salvage something useful from what appeared to be an impending disaster for the multilateral work on global warming.

The Turkish government is widely seen in the global community as having been determined on creating disruption in the international climate negotiations. The system is designed to operate by unanimous agreement. Typically, that means if there are several nations in the competition those with less support either withdraw gracefully, or a compromise is quietly done to encourage them to exit the race.

The Turkish bid plainly had weaker endorsement than the joint Pacific proposal to organize the summit. At least 24 of the 28 countries responsible for selecting next year's venue had supported the Australian bid.

However, exceptionally, Turkey refused to yield. The word "bastardry" has been thrown around in recent days, and not only by Australians.

International Dynamics

Ankara's stubbornness can be read as a manifestation of the divided international landscape. With the US absent under the former president, there has been no major power with the influence to confront the petroleum exporters that provided the Turks with some cover.

The Turkish president is seen as aligned with the Russian leader. Some countries feared a summit obstructed from the leadership if his government led the negotiations. And the Germans did not want to have to host an unprepared Cop31 at the UN climate headquarters in the German city, which is what would have occurred under international regulations if the deadlock wasn't resolved.

An Innovative Approach

A path through was necessary. The UN system is imperfect and often disconcerting to watch, but global cooperation has demonstrably had an impact in the fight against global heating. This joint approach is a creative idea that maintains progress when it is most crucial.

Despite reasonable concerns of the Australian government over its contradictory stance for expanding carbon-based exports, climate activists who participate in international meetings see Bowen as a force for good in the negotiations. He has been requested to co-chair discussion groups at each of the four conferences he has attended.

This is significant. Although certain critics have downplayed the role of a "chief negotiator", specialists from research centers and experienced analysts at climate talks assert it is crucial to their positive outcome.

"Every successful Cop has been determined by a leader holding the pen who can understand, build consensus and deliver an significant result. We saw that in Berlin in 1995, in Cancún in 2010 and the French capital in 2015. We saw the opposite in Copenhagen in 2009," they note. "This position is critical at the Cop except for making sure that delegates are fed."

Remaining Concerns

There are plenty of unanswered questions. For example, non-governmental organizations is essential at environmental summits. What, if at all, can the Australian government do to stop a crackdown on civil society by the Turkish leadership?

Possibly little. However, this doesn't prevent this deal appearing as the best chance possible to have a summit that may provide benefits for the Pacific region, Australia and the global community. This attempt is justified.